:: anne in the attic ::

::::: ANNE IN THE ATTIC :::::
:: anne in the attic :: bloghome :: my music site :: view profile | contact ::




Create Your Own Countdown

[::..recommended..::]
:: Tape Op [>]
:: deviantART [>]
:: Pandora Radio [>]
:: Sub Pop Records [>]
:: KCRW [>]
:: Air America Radio [>]
:: BOAR.COM [>]
:: Basic Rights Oregon [>]
[::..my blog archives..::]
February 2003
March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
July 2008
January 2009

:: Friday, May 28, 2004 ::

Some post-"Pilgrimage to California" road trip musings:

Thirty-year-old memories, like the bubbles in blown glass, are distorted, permanent, deeply embedded, hand-hewn. The human element had its effect long ago, and now time slowly erodes them until the dust can be simply blown away.

I think of the short story by Jorge Luis Borges, "Funes the Memorious," in which the main character suffers a perfect memory for every detail of his existence, his experience. At one point, he expresses a difficulty in having the same name for "a dog at three-fourteen (seen in profile)" as for "[the same dog] at three-fifteen (seen from the front)." On some level, I would have to agree on the propriety of incorporating both time and perspective into our nomenclature, specific as we already believe it to be.

How else could I explain that the house at Robert Court, seen from all sides in 1969 at the four-year-old height and comprehension, is not the same as the house seen from the front in 2004 at the thirty-eight-year-old height and comprehension? Yet it is the same house. In the same place. And parts of the old memories fall together easily, some of them normal, heartening, others eerie and somewhat alien.

Perhaps now, as an adult, I wonder what my life really was like back then. I'd like to go back and take a closer look-- not to affect or to change circumstances, but just to observe them, to know them better. What am I forgetting? Have I lost something integral? I want to know. It's kind of why I went back. Guess I didn't quite know that when I left here.

Not knowing the alternatives, I think that I am grateful things went the way they did: it's the only way I could end up here... now. Perhaps that's a bit fatalistic, but with the twist of choice, of the possibilities of many paths which always lay before us in the potential. In a way, Kirk's life ended early so that mine became as it is today. I would thank him for the choice to have a child enter his life, if only briefly, and for sowing the seeds for my life in just the way that he must have. And, when I finally made it back thirty-five years later, for showing up on cue.

:: Anne 9:35 PM [smartass remarks] ::
...
Comments: Post a Comment

This page is powered by Blogger. Isn't yours?